<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.159 (http://www.squarespace.com) on Thu, 23 May 2013 09:57:59 GMT--><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><title>Israel's future depends on removal of outposts</title><subtitle>Israel's future depends on removal of outposts</subtitle><id>http://apjp.org/israels-future-depends-on-remo/</id><link rel="alternate" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="http://apjp.org/israels-future-depends-on-remo/"/><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://apjp.org/israels-future-depends-on-remo/atom.xml"/><updated>2011-03-13T23:52:53Z</updated><generator uri="http://five.squarespace.com/" version="Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.159 (http://www.squarespace.com)">Squarespace</generator><entry><title>Israel's future depends on removal of outposts - Haaretz Editorial</title><id>http://apjp.org/israels-future-depends-on-remo/2011/3/13/israels-future-depends-on-removal-of-outposts-haaretz-editor.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://apjp.org/israels-future-depends-on-remo/2011/3/13/israels-future-depends-on-removal-of-outposts-haaretz-editor.html"/><author><name>APJP</name></author><published>2011-03-13T23:48:01Z</published><updated>2011-03-13T23:48:01Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-GB"><![CDATA[<div id="main" class="article">
<div id="threecolumns" class="twocolumns">
<div id="content"><em><span style="font-size: 110%;">For too many years these outposts have defined  Israel's status in the  world as an occupier that ignores international  law, but the  government's policy of deception cannot go on.</span></em></div>
<div><a style="font-size: 80%;" href="http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/israel-s-future-depends-on-removal-of-outposts-1.348257">http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/israel-s-future-depends-on-removal-of-outposts-1.348257</a></div>
<div id="content">
<div class="article_page_main_margin main-news"><span class="writer"> <a href="http://www.haaretz.com/misc/writers/haaretz-editorial-1.239">Haaretz Editorial</a> </span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>﻿10 March 2011</p>
<p>The state's pledge to the High Court of  Justice to remove all outposts on private Palestinian land should raise  at least two questions: Why did the state have to wait for a High Court  order to acknowledge the illegality of the outposts, and why must it  wait until the end of 2011 to remove them?</p>
<p>For years, the state has possessed documents  attesting to the illegality of those outposts. Moreover, the government  itself pledged to the High Court and the U.S. government a number of  times in the past decade that it would act to remove them. In only a few  cases did the government show a willingness to keep its promises. But  for each structure demolished, it permitted the construction of hundreds  and perhaps thousands of new ones as it took administrative steps to  legitimize the legality of many other outposts and even announced its  intention to do so in the future.</p>
<table class="features" border="0" cellspacing="0" width="474">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2"><img title="outpost, March Madness - Biderman " src="http://www.haaretz.com/polopoly_fs/1.348270.1299717640%21/image/3318303955.jpg_gen/derivatives/landscape_295/3318303955.jpg" alt="outpost, March Madness - Biderman " /></td>
<td class="text" valign="top"><br /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="text" valign="bottom"><span style="font-size: 80%;">Photo by: Amos Biderman</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div id="dclk_objects_06" class="floated_right_ad" style="width: 300px; font-size: 0pt; overflow: auto;"></div>
<p>The  government usually explained its lack of action by saying that "in any  case" a final-status agreement would soon be signed with the  Palestinians, so unnecessary clashes with the settlers had no point. If  the government had proved its sincere intent to move negotiations ahead  with the Palestinians, if the government had agreed to a continued building freeze in the  settlements as the United States had demanded, and if the government had  changed its policy of closing its eyes to the settlers, this claim  could be treated seriously. But even now, when by its pledge the  government ostensibly wants to show that it seriously intends to obey  the law, the time it is taking raises the suspicion that it plans to  evade the pledge.</p>
<p>For too many years, Israel's governments  have made a mockery of the High Court when it comes to obeying the law  in the territories. They have put the rule of law at risk not only in  the territories, but in Israel as well. For too many years these  outposts have defined Israel's status in the world as an occupier that  ignores international law.</p>
<p>No Israeli law that seeks to frighten those  who call for a boycott of Israel can correct this. The leniency and  understanding that the High Court, the Civil Administration and the  State Prosecutor's Office have shown the government's policy of  deception cannot go on. The outposts must be removed immediately.  Israel's future depends on it.</p>]]></content></entry></feed>