A Strike Against Free Speech by Ahmad Tibi MK
 Friday, July 29, 2011 at 10:52AM
Friday, July 29, 2011 at 10:52AM 
 <http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/29/opinion/29iht-edtibi29.html?_r=3&ref=global> 
 A Strike Against Free Speech
 
 By AHMAD TIBI
 
 New York Times  29/7/2011
 Free speech in Israel was dealt a severe blow this month when the country’s Parliament passed antiboycott legislation that targets individuals or organizations publicly calling for a boycott against Israel or any area under its control.
 Because I believe in ending the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territory, equal rights for Palestinians and Jews, and the right of return for Palestinian refugees forced from their homes and lands in 1948, I support boycotting — and calling on others to boycott — all Israeli companies that help perpetuate these injustices.
 But this new legal limit on free speech could bankrupt me.
 Israeli officials will not throw me in jail for publicly supporting such 
 boycotts, but settler groups can claim financial damages without even having 
 to show any harm done. Furthermore, organizations supporting boycotts could 
 be denied tax-deductible contributions and state funding. This week, I 
 appealed the law to the high court.
 Already, a member of the Knesset, our Parliament, Alex Miller, has 
 threatened to sue me for my words — specifically my call, which I continue 
 to make today, to boycott the illegal Jewish settlement of Ariel. Such a 
 call would be unremarkable in a proper democracy with untrammeled free 
 speech. The right to criticize a population that has dispossessed 
 Palestinians and discriminated against us for decades should be protected 
 speech.
 Perhaps my parliamentary immunity will protect me, but that can readily be 
 stripped. Moreover, parliamentary immunity will not protect Israelis who 
 urge fellow citizens not to buy Ahava beauty products created from natural 
 resources illegally extracted from the occupied shores of the Dead Sea and 
 manufactured in a factory in an illegal West Bank settlement, to avoid wines 
 from the occupied Golan Heights, or to hire construction companies other 
 than those that build exclusive and discriminatory housing units for 
 settlers in occupied East Jerusalem.
 Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has proudly taken ownership of the bill 
 for his Likud party, declaring: “Don’t be confused — I authorized the bill. 
 If I hadn’t authorized it, it wouldn’t have gotten here.” Given Netanyahu’s 
 warm reception on Capitol Hill when he visited the United States a few weeks 
 ago, I fear that most members of Congress will not offer a peep of protest, 
 even as Israel, a key American ally that bills itself as “the only democracy 
 in the Middle East,” strays into undemocratic and clearly bigoted lawmaking.
 The Israeli Parliament’s antiboycott legislation is an unprecedented effort 
 to undercut nonviolent resistance to Israeli oppression. Many people believe 
 that making nonviolence more difficult will make violence inevitable. I do 
 not. Approving such irresponsible and reactionary legislation highlights 
 Israel’s long decades of injustice to Palestinians and hands us something of 
 a political victory. Through this legislation, Israel has drawn further 
 attention to its violent occupation of Palestinian territory and routine 
 violations of international law.
 Colonizing settlers and their elected representatives now rule Israel’s 
 political landscape, and few dare to stand against them. This reticence in 
 the face of repeated abuses by settlers reflects poorly on Israeli society 
 and the U.S. government.
 One of Israel’s leading newspapers, Haaretz, noted in an editorial that the 
 antiboycott legislation “is a politically opportunistic and antidemocratic 
 act, the latest in a series of outrageously discriminatory and exclusionary 
 laws enacted over the past year, and it accelerates the process of 
 transforming Israel’s legal code into a disturbingly dictatorial document. 
 It casts the threatening shadow of criminal offense over every boycott, 
 petition or even newspaper op-ed. Very soon, all political debate will be 
 silenced.”
 Haaretz may well be right. I prefer to believe, however, that the overreach 
 of the extreme right in Israel will eventually rouse people of good will in 
 the United States and Europe to put greater pressure on the Israeli 
 government to change course. Despite the hopes of American politicians, 
 Israel is not going to change on its own. Only very real international 
 pressure will force the Israeli government to change. Until then, we can 
 expect more discriminatory and undemocratic legislation from this Knesset.
 Ahmad Tibi, an Arab Israeli, is deputy speaker of the Israeli Parliament.
 APJP |
APJP |    Post a Comment |
Post a Comment |   
Reader Comments